Kampala, Uganda – July 25, 2024
The Uganda Police Force (UPF) has issued a directive halting the planned public meetings organized by the National Unity Platform (NUP) in the districts of Bugweri, Pallisa, and Soroti, citing violations of previously agreed-upon guidelines and traffic regulations. This move has sparked significant controversy and debate regarding the enforcement of public order laws and the rights of political parties to conduct their activities freely.
In a letter dated July 23, 2024, addressed to the Secretary General of NUP, the UPF acknowledged receipt of NUP’s notification for public meetings intended for July 18, 2024. The police cited several instances of non-compliance with established guidelines during past events, specifically highlighting the disruption of traffic and unsafe practices observed during processions.
Key Violations Cited:
- July 15, 2024: A Toyota Hiace vehicle carrying passengers on its rooftop was spotted between Fort Portal and Bundibugyo. This action was deemed highly unsafe and a direct violation of traffic laws.
- July 16, 2024: A procession along Bushenyi-Ishaka Road where a party leader stopped in the middle of the road to greet individuals, with passengers seated in the vehicle’s windows. Such behavior was flagged for obstructing traffic and posing a risk to both passengers and other road users.
- July 16, 2024: Supporters gathered beside the highway in Ntungamo, causing significant disruption to traffic flow. This gathering was unregulated and led to considerable inconvenience for other road users.
- July 18, 2024: A Toyota Hiace observed carrying passengers seated in windows in Ntungamo Municipality. The vehicle was not only overcrowded but also failed to adhere to basic traffic safety regulations.
Citing Article 43(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, the police emphasized that no person shall prejudice the fundamental or other human rights and freedoms of others or the public interest in the enjoyment of their rights and freedoms. Additionally, Section 33(b) of the Police Act gives police powers to direct the conduct of assemblies and processions on public roads or streets or at places of public resort.
NUP Leader Responds:
In response, NUP leader Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu, popularly known as Bobi Wine, took to social media to express his frustration. He accused the police of partisan actions aimed at blocking NUP’s mobilization activities while other political parties and actors continue their activities unhindered.
“Ahead of our planned activities in Bugweri, Pallisa and Soroti this weekend, the partisan police through Frank Mwesigwa has yet again blocked our mobilization activities! While other political parties and actors continue to have their activities including processions and rallies, the regime is always looking for any excuse to block us!” Bobi Wine tweeted.
He further emphasized the non-violent stance of NUP, urging supporters to remain civil while resisting what he termed as “madness” from the authorities.
“We have done everything to remain civil and non-violent. They are pushing us to a point where we must RESIST all this madness!” Bobi Wine added in his tweet, accompanied by the hashtag #FreeUganda, which has since gained traction among his supporters.
Police Justification and Legal Basis:
The UPF, in its letter, underscored the legal framework within which it operates, particularly referencing the Constitution and the Police Act. Article 43(1) of the Constitution mandates that in the enjoyment of rights and freedoms, individuals must not prejudice the rights and freedoms of others or the public interest. The Police Act, specifically Section 33(b), grants the police authority to regulate public assemblies and processions to ensure public order and safety.
The police have invited NUP for an engagement meeting on August 8, 2024, at the Police Headquarters to discuss the issues raised and to ensure compliance with the law for future public meetings. This meeting is seen as a critical step towards addressing the ongoing tensions and finding a mutually agreeable solution that respects both public order and the rights of political parties.
Forwarded to Regional Police Commanders:
The directive has been forwarded to the respective Regional Police Commanders of Busoga East, Bukedi North, and East Kyoga for implementation. The UPF has emphasized the need for stringent enforcement of traffic and public order laws to prevent any further violations and ensure the safety and convenience of all road users.
The situation continues to evolve as both the NUP and the UPF prepare for the upcoming engagement meeting. The outcome of this meeting will likely set a precedent for how future public meetings and political activities are managed and regulated in Uganda.
Public Reaction and Ongoing Debate:
The police’s actions have ignited a heated debate among the public and political analysts. Supporters of NUP argue that the police are acting under the influence of the ruling regime to stifle opposition activities, thereby undermining democratic principles. On the other hand, proponents of the police’s actions insist that maintaining public order and safety is paramount, and any political activities that jeopardize this must be regulated.
As the conversation continues, the balance between safeguarding public order and respecting political freedoms remains a contentious issue. The engagement meeting on August 8 will be a crucial forum for addressing these concerns and potentially charting a path forward that accommodates both legal obligations and the democratic aspirations of Uganda’s citizens.